-->

Sunday, October 27, 2013

UPSKIRT DAD'S SCHOOLGIRL SHAME

David Hurley Herald Sun October 24, 2013

A PAINTER used a mobile phone to film up the skirts of unsuspecting schoolgirls from a shopping basket in a supermarket before uploading the images online.
Paul Breitkreuz pleaded guilty to upskirting charges and a child porn offence when he appeared at the County Court in Melbourne.
The 28-year-old father-of-one made still images from 22 videos before swapping the pictures with other sexual deviants –The media, in particular, the tabloid media will use descriptions like 'sexual deviant' or 'serial pest' to help paint a picture which is then planted in your mind. This man swapped pictures with other people. Don't allow the mainstream tabloid press to define reality for you or you will find yourself allowing them to define for you @ other times as well if you are not careful– online.
The court heard Breitkreuz targeted girls in school uniform who were aged in their early teens when he prowled shopping centres in Melbourne's south east.
Prosecutor Josh Robins told the court one picture Breitkreuz uploaded was accompanied by a caption reading: "I snapped a 12/13 year old."
He then asked others in the online network, "How am I going?" and told them, "I'm just a beginner at this."
When police raided Breitkreuz's home in Keysborough they found 304 child porn images and two videos.
Most of the images had been emailed to him from other perverts –like politicians, religion, the military & advertisers, the concept of repetitious programming is practiced regularly by this publication. Of course it should be noticed that this type of programming is often served up to provide you with a scapegoat to blame so that you don't go blaming them. In the past/present black people, gays, women, the disabled, red heads, muslims, jews, communists, hippies etc have occupied the role of the 'approved scapegoat' that you are allowed to lambast until you are told otherwise. It is worth noting that you should not like/dislike because the government, religion, media tells you, but because you have thought about and felt your way to what is actually correct and true and respectful– on the internet.
Breitkreuz's pleaded guilty to three counts of upskirting, four counts of distributing images of a person's genitalia between July and October 2012 and one count of accessing child porn. This is the second occasion within seven sentences, that we have been told what he has been charged with, now in a little more detail. Why is that detail so important to them? Trying to pad out the story? Or are they trying, again, to program a particular item into you.
David Gibson, representing Breitkreuz, said his client was deeply ashamed of his actions.
Breitkreuz sobbed in the dock and was supported in court by his wife, his parents and his wife's parents.
Community response is instructive. He may be receiving support, but he has to live with and answer to these people for the rest of his life. Live with his actions and the damage caused by them.
Mr Gibson said: "They are matters of considerable shame.
"He understands the impact on his family. He now has a young daughter and that has brought home to him the evil of this type of offending."
This can only be true if the last of his offences, or the seized items on the computer, was more than four years ago. Otherwise he is happy to use his daughter as leverage to secure a lesser punishment. This is still child abuse. Not sexual abuse, but, nonetheless, it is an abuse of the interests of the child.  
Judge Jane Patrick will sentence Breitkreuz on November 4.
david.hurley@news.com.au

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/upskirt-dads-schoolgirl-shame/story-fni0fee2-1226746560067 

No comments:

Post a Comment